Islamic Revival

The Eastern and Western Ghouta Chemical Massacre is a Horrific Massacre. The Insolvent International Community Must be Held Accountable for Butcher Bashar is But One of its Death Tools On the dawn of Wednesday, 21/8/2013, Bashar the butcher ordered the bombing of neighborhoods in Eastern and Western Ghouta of rural Damascus using chemical weapons, leaving about 1300 killed and thousands of cases pathological symptoms as a result of this weapon that had struck children, women and men, in a scene that leaves no mercy what so ever in anyone's heart for the perpetrators of this act, which was denied by the criminal regime, and was described by the crow of the Syrian media Imran Al-Zobi as a ridiculous claim. America, the master of crime and global terrorism, with its habit of covering up the crimes of its agent, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said,  "We are formally requesting that the United Nations urgently investigate this new allegation".  He did not say to 

It is time for the free revolutionaries of ash-Sham to defeat this killer and defeat those conspiring with him and those who kill us with the mightiest types of weapons, led by chemical weapons coming from the Western and the Eastern states from the enemies of the Ummah! The cries of the bereaved mothers and suffocated children can only be prevailed by the shouts of the heroic free rebels who stood between the corpses of children, women and men, the victims of secular democracy and Western technology, and who expressed their mourning with their heads held high, declaring the oneness of Allah. Their emotion overflowed while cursing Bashar and every ruler of the Muslim world, that the hellfire be their last abode. The tongue of their dire situation spoke through one of the heroes from Ghouta ash-Sham, shouting: "Allahu Akbar over oh tyrants of the Muslims, these dead are from the Ummah of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم - the martyrs of Islam! Allahu Akbar over your silen

Question: In the book, Political Concepts on page 24 in the official English edition dated 1425 AH 2005 CE, on the subject of the international situation we find: "... As regarding the state that revolves in the orbit of another one, it is the one that is linked in its foreign policy with another state based on common interest and not as subordination. The example to this is Japan with America, Australia with each of America and Britain, Canada with each of America, Britain and France, and Turkey (currently) with each of America and Britain." The question is whether the state orbiting around another state can detach its foreign policy from the foreign policy of the major state around which it revolves? For example, can Turkey exit from America's foreign policy in the case of issues such as Syria? Answer: The state that revolves around another state may exit its orbit in parts of its foreign policy because the relation between the two states is based on inte