Skip to main content

Rulers of Harm intoxicated by a grain of raisin

News:
             Arab reactions continue to welcome the UN security councils to halt Jewish settlement construction in the occupied Palestinian territories, following a major vote of the members of the council on Friday on this decision, with the United States on the use of the right of (veto). A spokesman for the Palestinian presidency has said (Nabil Abu Radina) told AFP: “The Security’s Council decision is a big slap in the face of Israeli policy, and the condemnation of the entire international consensus to settle, and strongly support the two-state solution,” and the Palestinian Chief Negotiator saw (Saeb Erikat) that the day of voting on the decision is the day of triumph. The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) also expressed for the decision of rejecting the settlement, in that period of time the Islamic Jihad movement saw in the decision a clear condemnation of the policies of occupation and a victory for the Palestinian people. Saudi Arabia also welcomed the adoption of the security’s council decision. Permanent Delegation of the Kingdom said to the United Nations through his account on Twitter that its implementation would be a step towards achieving the Arab peace initiative. For his part, Qatari foreign minister (Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani) welcomed the UN Resolution, described Jordan's decision as a historic decision, and it is a positive step towards a two-state solution which is a higher Jordanian interest (according to a statement in this regard). In Kuwait, he described president of the National Assembly, "parliament" (Marzouq Al-Ghanim) the decision as "a step in the right direction." Al Jazeera Net.
Comment:
The decision came from the international community after turning our backs to the people of Syria in general and the people of Aleppo, especially, after collusion with the butcher of Sham al-Assad and his allies of Russians and Persians criminals and all mercenaries on earth to kill the people of Syria, at the thought of it that this decision will show the world that he is a person of principles, and that he helps to beat these issues even if those issues are in favor of Muslims and against the tool of the corrupt Jewish state! But these participants have forgotten in this unjust society that people become convinced – have reached the extent of conviction- that not all Security Council resolutions are applicable, decisions that apply are those which agree with the interests of the members of this major forum of colonial powers (namely the five permanent members), or else they are decisions which aren’t applicable, and are not worth the ink that you write with, and the biggest testament to the latter:
The resolutions issued by the Security Council itself on the issue of Palestine, which one of them is not implemented from any of the decisions, the Jewish state did not oblige or force them out, as do the colonial powers in the decisions which interest them; We were not denouncing the Jewish state of acceleration in the words of Prime Minister denying this decision and rejected the application, rather accusing the US administration of President Obama collusion would not use the right of (veto).
After the Arab and Muslim rulers of Palestine by the Palestine Liberation Organization, which made her (sole and legitimate representative) to the question of Palestine, and the Organization signed of the ominous Oslo agreement, the organization which recognized the name of all Arab countries by the state of the Jews, and rampage toward normalization with the Jewish state without any charge, Arab and Muslim rulers found in this decision a victory for them! They were truly like someone who is drunk from a grain of raisins, what a low traitors! We can not fail here, said the Egyptian government's refusal to provide this project to the Security Council, in a move that confirms the keenness of the regime in Egypt to the Jewish state more than the sponsorship of America himself!
This decision came after it was filled with the West Bank settlements, having secured the Jewish state more than 78% of the blessed pure land, which is occupied in 1948 as well as Jerusalem, where no one can argue it and these settlements they are talking about is the remainder of the blessed land, in a small spot to hope that the Arab countries, including the PLO to establish a Palestinian state on them, and these spots have become the settlements and in them are more Arab towns! So after this farce, does the international community and those from the states of harm in the Islamic world think that they are fooling the best nation, the nation that only accepts full right to the blessed land, with its seas and rivers, with the achievement of fulfilling the bushra of the messenger of Allah (saaw) in it, which appeared in the hadith saying: ((تقاتلون اليهود فتسلطون عليهم حتى يختبئ أحدهم وراء الحجر فيقول الحجر يا عبد الله هذا يهودي ورائي فاقتله))  "The Last Hour will not come until the Muslims fight against the Jews and the Muslims kill them to the extent that the Jews will hide behind a rock or a tree and the rock or the tree will say: O' Muslim, the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;” Related by Bukhari, Muslim and Tirmidhi
Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Bilal Al-Muhajer/ Pakistan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran