Skip to main content

Paris Conspiratorial Conference Confines the Solution for the Issue of Palestine in the “Treacherous” Negotiation Solution

With a wide international participation and presence of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the final statement of the International Peace Conference, which was held in the French capital Paris on Sunday, confirmed that a negotiated solution of two states, Jewish entity and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security is the only way to achieve lasting peace.
We, in Hizb ut Tahrir in the Blessed Land of Palestine, consider all those who participated in the conference or welcomed its outputs is a conspirator against Palestine and its people, a squanderer of the Blessed Land of Palestine for the Jewish occupation. We affirm the following:
Palestine is an Islamic land usurped and occupied by the Jews who established their terrorist entity on it and forced its people to migrate from it, with the help of France; the sponsor of the conference, Britain; the owner of the infamous Balfour Declaration, and America; the supporter of the Jewish entity with money, weapons and unjust international resolutions. This blessed land is in need of liberation from the clutches of the occupation, and confining the solution of the issue in negotiation only means preventing its liberation and legitimizing the Jewish entity.
The existing regimes in the Muslim world, including the Arab world, through their participation in the conference and welcoming its outputs, have abandoned the duty to move their armies to liberate Palestine and agreed to limit the solution in negotiation leading to the abandonment of most of Palestine to the Jews in exchange for a meager statelet for the leaders of the Palestinian Authority.
The final statement of the conference has equated the resistance of the people of Palestine to the occupation and the criminal acts carried out by the occupation soldiers and the settlers, considering the resistance violence and terrorism. The conference also stressed on the maintenance of the security of the usurper Jewish entity. All of these make the participant, and the one who welcomed the conference and its outputs a criminal and a squanderer for the Blessed Land of Palestine.
The Islamic Ummah, particularly the people of Palestine will not forgive those who sold Palestine or welcomed its wasting or abandoned Palestine and its people for the benefit of the Jews, and they look forward to a day when the rightly guided Khilafah (Caliphate) on the method of the Prophethood is established, which would move the hordes of conquest and liberation cheering, snarling and chanting Takbeer, to uproot the Jewish entity from the whole of Palestine and bring it back to the lands of Islam and this will be, Allah willing, in spite of the unbelievers, the squanderers and their associates.
﴿وَسَيَعْلَمُ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا أَيَّ مُنْقَلَبٍ يَنْقَلِبُونَ
“And those who have wronged are going to know to what [kind of] return they will be returned.” ]Ash-Shu’ara: 227[.
Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

in the Blessed Land – Palestine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran