Skip to main content

Syria’s al-Nusra Announces Split from al-Qaeda


In a long awaited dec­la­ra­tion, the leader of [what was for­merly known as] Jah­bat al-Nusra, Abu Muham­mad Al-Julani declared the dis­so­lu­tion of Nusra and in an all the more dras­tic step, the for­ma­tion of a new group, Jab­hat Fath al-Sham, which would no longer be affil­i­ated with al-Qaeda. The dec­la­ra­tion comes as no sur­prise, as debates inside and out­side of the group have been brew­ing over the past months over the need to break with al-Qaeda, a debate which was all the more exac­er­bated fol­low­ing the for­ma­tion of the inter­na­tional coali­tion against ISIS and the ten­sions that emerged between Nusra and other Jihadist fac­tions such as Ahrar al-Sham. In fact, sev­eral key fig­ures in Nusra have long advo­cated for this split. The most promi­nent of whom was Abu Maryam al-Qahtani. Early this week, reports indi­cated that Jab­hat al-Nusra’s Shura Coun­cil had taken the deci­sion to split from al-Qaeda, and that an announce­ment was forthcoming.

The state­ment begins with Julani thank­ing al-Qaeda’s leader, Ayman al-Zawahari, for their con­tri­bu­tions to the Jihad in Syria. Julani goes on to quote Osama Bin Laden, in stress­ing that the inter­ests of the Ummah must be given pri­or­ity to those of any orga­ni­za­tion. The state­ment, metic­u­lously worded, makes the split appear more like an ami­ca­ble break with al-Qaeda than a sev­er­ance. Sit­ting to the right of al-Julani was Abu al-Farj al-Masri and to his right, Abu ‘Abd Allah al-Shami. Abu al-Faraj, whose real name is Ahmad Salamah Mabrouk, is an Egypt­ian scholar who was released shortly after the Jan­u­ary 25th rev­o­lu­tion. Soon there­after, he joined the Syr­ian rebels in 2011. Accord­ing to many observers, al-Faraj is a senior jurist in al-Nusra. Abu ‘Abd Allah, also known as ‘Abd ar-Raheem ‘Atoon, is a promi­nent mem­ber of al-Nusra’s Shura Coun­cil and a promi­nent jurist. In appear­ing before cam­eras, with these two senior jurist, al-Julani is demon­strat­ing that the deci­sion, far from being prag­matic, was under­taken under the aus­pices of Islamic precedents.

The declared objec­tives of the new group is the estab­lish­ment of the Shari’ah and jus­tice in Syria, the uni­fi­ca­tion of Jihadi fac­tions in Syria, the preser­va­tion and con­ti­nu­ity of the Syr­ian rev­o­lu­tion and pro­vid­ing Mus­lims with all nec­es­sary forms of aid and assis­tance in order to alle­vi­ate their condition.
There are sev­eral motives behind this split. First and fore­most, Nusra has long been polarised among other rebel fac­tions for its transna­tional Jihadist vision and its affil­i­a­tion with al-Qaeda. As part of al-Qaeda, al-Nusra had lit­tle room to artic­u­late a strat­egy for Syria given the over­ar­ch­ing and global nature of al-Qaeda’s polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary objectives.
Sec­ondly, regional pow­ers have grap­pled with the ques­tion of al-Nusra’s sta­tus, as to whether or not the orga­ni­za­tion should be listed as a “ter­ror­ist group” or not. This ques­tion became all the more crit­i­cal given that many foreign-backed rebel groups are mil­i­tar­ily and logis­ti­cally allied to al-Nusra.
Shortly after the dec­la­ra­tion, mil­i­tary offi­cials belong­ing to the inter­na­tional coali­tion were quick to announce that the change in name did not exempt Nusra from its strikes and that it remained a ter­ror­ist group. In fact, in Julani’s state­ment, no indi­ca­tion is made that the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity might recon­sider the group’s sta­tus in Syria and goes on to men­tion that the United States and Rus­sia are ene­mies of the Syr­ian rev­o­lu­tion. This should also, in no way, be viewed as a break from the Jihadi move­ment. In the days pre­ced­ing the dec­la­ra­tion, reports sug­gested that the lead­ing Salafi Jihadi scholar, Abu Muham­mad al-Maqdisi, was con­sulted on whether or not the group should split and appar­ently al-Maqdisi sup­ported the move. Other Jihadi rebel groups were also quick to applaud the split. Abu Hamza al-Hamwi, the leader of Jund al-Sham, stated that the split was a pos­i­tive step towards the uni­fi­ca­tion of rebel groups in Syria and a deci­sion which con­formed to the inter­ests of the Syr­ian revolution.

What then, is the pri­mary objec­tive behind this dec­la­ra­tion? Spec­u­la­tions could be made, such as; allow­ing greater coop­er­a­tion with regional actors, open­ing the door for ide­o­log­i­cal lax­ity, adopt­ing more ambiva­lent and “mod­er­ate pos­tures”. But spec­u­la­tions aside, one thing is clear; the split from al-Qaeda and the dis­so­lu­tion of al-Nusra is a major pub­lic rela­tions move intended to improve the organization’s image inside Syria. This is all the more sub­stan­ti­ated by the fact that the orga­ni­za­tion went as far as chang­ing its name. That is to say, it wanted to make clear that we have com­pletely bro­ken all ties, and this is our new face. The dis­as­so­ci­a­tion with al-Qaeda, in and of itself, seems to be the key change. Fol­low­ing Julani’s dec­la­ra­tion, the group released a 15-point man­i­festo that in no way dif­fers from their pre­vi­ous polit­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal stances. Now that the orga­ni­za­tion has more room to man­age its own image inside and out­side Syria and artic­u­late a strat­egy inde­pen­dent of exter­nal orga­ni­za­tions, it can play a more pow­er­ful polit­i­cal role in Syria. Given that the orga­ni­za­tion was affil­i­ated with al-Qaeda and its dis­tinct polit­i­cal objec­tives, such a polit­i­cal pos­ture inside Syria was nearly impos­si­ble. Fur­ther­more, these shifts seem to be part of a larger trend among Jihadist who are increas­ingly domes­ti­cat­ing their Jihad. That is not to say, how­ever, that al-Nusra has come to terms with the nation-state with­out nec­es­sar­ily accept­ing its ide­o­log­i­cal baggage.

The for­ma­tion of Jab­hat al-Sham coin­cides, be it inten­tion­ally or oth­er­wise, with sev­eral crit­i­cal devel­op­ments in Syria’s com­plex mil­i­tary and polit­i­cal land­scape. For starters, rebels have lost most of East­ern Aleppo to the Syr­ian Arab Army, which has also cut off most roads lead­ing inside and out­side of the province. Sec­ondly, the United States and Rus­sia have reaf­firmed their joint com­mit­ment to strike al-Nusra in Syria and restart­ing peace-talks. At this point, it is dif­fi­cult to spec­u­late how the split will affect the Syr­ian rev­o­lu­tion. Given that al-Nusra has now shed its affil­i­a­tion with al-Qaeda, we can expect stronger coor­di­na­tion with rebel groups which had been pre­vi­ously appre­hen­sive about al-Nusra. In turn, this is likely to com­pli­cate the already frag­ile and com­plex rela­tion­ship between these rebel groups and regional power-brokers. On a more inter­na­tional level, it might deepen the schisms between regional pow­ers that wel­come the [long awaited] split with inter­na­tional pow­ers like the United States and Rus­sia, who have dis­missed it as being mean­ing­less.
-
Ali S. Harfouch
Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran