Skip to main content

Q&A: Russia's Annexation of Crimea


Question:
Russia has annexed the Crimea, and Putin signed a document regarding this on 18/3/2014. Does this mean that what happened is a preliminary step by Russia to annex the rest of Ukraine, and especially after it was met with a feeble reaction the West?
Jazaak Allah Khair.
Answer:
As we have mentioned before in our answers that the current regional and international conditions do not allow any of the three parties, Ukraine's stakeholders, to control Ukraine completely, but the solution expected between the three parties is a compromise ... therefore Russia overtaking the whole of Ukraine is unlikely at the moment, or at least in the foreseeable future. If Russia was able to settle in Crimea, it means that the West, especially America, will settle in the rest of Ukraine.
As for overtaking the whole of Ukraine by any of the three parties, as we have said, it is unlikely at this time, or at least in the near future.
What seems to be currently taking place is an indication to the implementation of the compromise; Russia controlling Crimea, and the West, especially America controlling the rest of Ukraine, and these indicators are:
- Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoygu contacted his U.S. counterpart, Chuck Hagel via phone call on Thursday, 20/3/2014, stating that Moscow will not attack Eastern Ukraine and told him: "The forces dispersed along the border are just there for military exercises, but do not have any intention to cross the border to Ukraine or to carry out any act of aggression."
- The statement by the interim government in Kiev confirmed on the same day "it will respond militarily" to any Russian attempt to annex parts of the Russian-speaking east of Ukraine. "Knowing that it has stated regarding the Crimea before that on 19/3/2014 of its readiness to withdraw its troops from the Crimea; the head of the security apparatus, Andrey Probai, in the Ukraine stated that his country is preparing to withdraw its troops and citizens of Crimea. He said that the main objective is to transfer the forces and Ukrainian families in "the fastest and most efficient ways."
This indicates the signs of the compromise to exchange the peninsula for the rest of Ukraine! Ukraine's interest in the Eastern region is more prominent, while the degree of interest in the peninsula decreased.
These signs have become clear on Friday, 21/03/2014 during the European Summit held in Brussels, where the European Union signed political conditions to the partnership agreement with the interim Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk. An agreement that will make Kiev closer to its membership in the united European bloc; the agreement that caused the crisis between Ukraine and Russia, when the decision by former Ukrainian President Yanukovych not to sign it have led to a massive wave of protests and demonstrations by the Ukrainians ...
In addition, all the indicators expose the nature of the compromise solution... However, as we said in our previous answers, Ukraine will remain a time bomb waiting to explode when the international and regional conditions change either in favor of Russia or the West, then each party will attempt to take the whole of Ukraine in accordance with the international circumstances at the time ... Ukraine is the waist line of Russia, at the same time a gateway to Europe.
Unless there is a change in international and regional conditions the compromise solution will remain in place, this in the short term may lead to stability and " temporary peace " ... As for lasting stability, especially in Crimea, it will not be achieved unless it returns to what it was before the Russian occupation and its stability since the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century, i.e. when it returns as part of the coming Khilafah State, God willing.
21 Jumada I 1435 AH
22/03/2014 CE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran