Skip to main content

US Aid is Poison and its End is a Thousand Times Easier than its Continuance

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Jennifer Psaki, Spokesperson for the US State Department said on 9/10/2013 that Washington would freeze military and economic assistance to Egypt, while waiting for the country to make credible progress towards a democratically elected civilian government. The Los Angeles Times quoted US officials who emphasized that core U.S. security interests in the region, including the Egypt-Israeli peace treaty, would not be jeopardized by the cuts.

We recognize that these statements from America do not mean the final relinquishment of poisoned aid to Egypt. Rather they are a means of threatening the new government according to what America wants, so nothing takes place against their interests. Ever since America entered the Middle East as a neo-colonial power, it has used aid as a means to colonize people and expand control and influence. During a conference in Istanbul held by American diplomats accredited to the Arab Group on 2nd October 1950 under the chairmanship of George Maggie, representative in the State Department, it was among the schemes "to take cooperation with the people of the country as a means of access to the region" in their habit of forging names to sell the wolf in sheep's clothing!

This means that toxic aid that they called "cooperation" stem from the heart of America's policy to penetrate the depths of the region and to produce agents, while looting the wealth and sucking its blood. America has used the method of aid to colonize Indonesia. When Sukarno in the 1950s refused American aid, they continued to harass him through threats and intimidation until he accepted the aid and then U.S. influence entered Indonesia and continues to exist until today.

Thus, what America has called humanitarian assistance in its dictionaries is in fact colonial projects under an economic pretext, even to its friends! The Marshall Plan after World War II named European Recovery Program was the gateway for American companies to be an active partner in many parts of the European economy. After ten years had passed the European economy in general became the property of American companies. Although it has decreased somewhat in recent years, the impact of U.S. companies on the European economy still exists today.

All of the aid is evil, because reality shows that the Kaffir colonial states, especially America, do not offer aid except to extend their influence and hegemony, to serve their interests, as well as the interests of the Jewish entity. All this is secured for the grievous crime of the Camp David Agreement. Even officials of the Jewish entity are wary of the impact of reducing US aid to Egypt, as the entity considers "US aid to Egypt an important pillar of the Camp David Agreement." The US aid is nothing but harm, and the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said:

لَا ضَرَرَ وَلَا ضِرَارَ
"No harm and no causation of harm."
As reported by al-Hakim in his Mustadrak, and he said: "This is a Hadith with a Sahih chain of transmission according to the conditions of Muslim, although he did not report it."

The acceptance of this aid is a major crime in Islam, because it creates ways for the colonialist Kuffar to enter Muslims lands through influence, economy and politics. Allah سبحانه وتعالى says:
وَلَنْ يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكَافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِيلًا
"Allah will not give the disbelievers any way against the believers [to overcome them]"(An-Nisaa, 4:141)
This is on the one hand. On the other hand, this aid is not worth anything of the Egyptian GDP. American aid of about $1.5 billion does not amount to more than 0.3% of the GDP of Egypt, not to mention that it is not worth anything of Egypt's wealth of oil, gas and metals, and the traffic in the Suez Canal. The slightest lifting of tolls in the Suez Canal would bring in a multiple of that amount, as well as cutting off gas to the Jewish entity which is being sold cheaply! Selling this gas at market prices would bring in a multiple of that amount, besides that we are in an actual state of war with the Jewish entity which has usurped the land of al-Isra' wal-Mi'raj. It is not permissible under any circumstances to engage in peaceful relations with them, neither political nor economic.

As for widespread rumors that poverty and economic crises would befall the country were it not for this aid, then this is a feeble statement. The poverty of the Muslim countries is an artificial poverty caused by the shortage of those occupying the seats of governance and the sources of decision makers. The wealth of the Ummah and its public property is squandered on corruption, harmful to the country and its people. Instead of public property being distributed to the Ummah which is their right, it settles in the pockets of those in power, in their domestic and foreign bank accounts, both secretly and publicly. The country is then tied to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund through America's poison called aid. This is the cause of poverty in the Muslim countries, although they are abundant with God-given wealth far-exceeding their needs, if only properly placed within the framework as disclosed by the Kind, the All-knowing.

Oh Muslims in the land of Egypt: Your duty is to show the initiative by rejecting this aid, instead of America threatening you with cutting it off! The basic principle is to prevent this toxic aid from entering the country. Rejecting the aid strikes America and the Jewish entity in a deadly spot. This is what we must excel in and where we must spend our utmost effort. Our answer must be to throw their poison in their faces, instead of Ambassador Badr Abdul 'Atiy, spokesman of the Egyptian Foreign Ministry, saying: "This decision is improper in terms of content and timing". He added: "Egypt is also interested in the continuation of good relations with the United States!"

It was on as-Sisi's coup to throw this aid in the face of its owner, and to toss America's toxin back into its throat, so they will know that the land of Egypt finds strength in their Lord and honor in their Deen. Unfortunately this coup is far from this. Rather it has been busy with killing people, so they will say only what he says and see only what he sees, as Pharaoh said before:

قَالَ فِرْعَوْنُ مَا أُرِيكُمْ إِلَّا مَا أَرَى
"Pharaoh said, 'I only show you what I see myself'"(Ghaafir, 40:29)

The murder of the soul which Allah has forbidden except by right will cause the murderer to perish in this world and the hereafter. From what he صلى الله عليه وسلم said to the crowd of people on the day of Arafah was:
فَإِنَّ دِمَاءَكُمْ، وَأَمْوَالَكُمْ، وَأَعْرَاضَكُمْ، بَيْنَكُمْ حَرَامٌ، كَحُرْمَةِ يَوْمِكُمْ هَذَا، فِي شَهْرِكُمْ هَذَا، فِي بَلَدِكُمْ هَذَا
"Your blood, your wealth, your honors are sacred amongst you as the sanctity of this day, in this month, on this soil." [Reported by al-Bukhari]

Whoever kills a soul unjustly has wronged his Deen and his Ummah, and his fate is as described by the Strong, the Glorious:


سَيُصِيبُ الَّذِينَ أَجْرَمُوا صَغَارٌ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ وَعَذَابٌ شَدِيدٌ بِمَا كَانُوا يَمْكُرُونَ
"Debasement in the sight of Allah and a severe punishment will strike those who did wrong for the plots that they concocted."
(Al-An'am, 6:124)
That is what has been done to their adherents before them, and the wise is the one who takes a lesson from what happened to others:

إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَذِكْرَى لِمَنْ كَانَ لَهُ قَلْبٌ أَوْ أَلْقَى السَّمْعَ وَهُوَ شَهِيدٌ
"There is a reminder in that for anyone who has a heart, or who listens well, having seen the evidence."
(Qaf, 50:37)

Hizb ut Tahrir
6th Dhul Hijjah 1434 AH
11th October 2013 CE

NOTE. The above is a translation of the meaning of the original Arabic leaflet

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran