Skip to main content

Alawites' Solidarity Fracturing


By Abu Anas


The Alawite minority religious sect, which Bashar al-Assad belongs to, has been ruling Syria since 1970. As a minority, they consist of at most 2.3 million people; 11% of the population. For the Alawite regime to subdue a Muslim Sunni majority, it had to control every aspect of the state's apparatus especially the military, police and security services. They have permeated every sector of the state's institutions and have aligned themselves with other minorities like the Druze, Christians, and Shi'a in a position of unquestioned power. Things might have started to change!

One of the pillars that continues to hold the regime together is the cohesiveness of the Alawite community in Syria. The Assad regime has stirred lots of animosity between the different religious groups in Syria, especially playing on the fears of the Alawite community of a Sunni backlash in case the regime falls, to maintain that support. Assad relied exclusively on that support from this sectarian base to fight and kill the Sunni-majority rebels. His Republican Guard and the military's 4th Divisions are made up of mostly Alawite officers. In addition, the Shabiha, mobs or gangs, that have been responsible for inhumane atrocities against civilians are also mostly Alawite, under the leadership of his loyal relatives, like his cousin Mohammed al-Assad.1

This sectarian based support to al-Assad began to unravel in his hometown, Qardaha, which is the epicenter of the Assad and Alawite regime. Late Friday night on September the 28th, a fight broke out between the Assad family members and other prominent Alawite families in that city, which have led to the killing of Mohammed al-Assad himself.2 Other reports state that another main figure, Maher al-Assad's right-hand man, Col. Ali Khuzam, was also killed in those clashes.3 Many reports from within Syria claimed that the sense of hopelessness and fear from post-Assad retribution by the rebels have led some Alawite families to question Assad's authority which provoked his supporters into this deadly clash.2

Several issues have led to this increasing anxiety by the Alawite community. First, it is the Free Syrian Army's gradual march towards Alawite cities and towns within the coastal region, mainly populated by Alawites, and their recent capture of the 35th regiment base there. Second, is the accumulation of deaths within the Alawite officers that fueled discontent of their families.3 Third, is the financial extortion inflicted upon the Alawite community by the Shabiha to finance their campaign against the rebels due to the regime's incapability to pay their bills.4 All these issues, have led to this discontent within the Alawite community which have led some of its members to oppose al-Assad publicly through the formation of opposition groups like the "Free Alawites."5 Even Alawite military officers have defected from the regime and joined the rebels, the last example of which a female officer, Lt. Colonel Zubaida al-Miqi, announced her defection today.6

It is very natural for the Alawite community to realize that supporting Assad is a very risky business that sets the whole sect in confrontation with the Sunni majority. In addition, Assad’s opponents within the Alawites will find this an opportune time to assume leadership of this sect and make a deal with the rebels to remove him from power. The sheer inhumanity of  the regime’s brutality will cause people to want to switch sides. So Assad faces an existential problem ahead due to this waning of support from this popular base. This atmosphere makes it ripe for apalace coup orchestrated by Alawite officers to relieve their community and themselves from the burden of protecting one family, al-Asaad.

The US has recognized these divisions within the regime and moved immediately to be on standby for a possible "preparations for total-regime-collapse scenarios," through sending special troops to Jordan.7 Turkey's move to force a Syrian airplane to land in one of its airports to be inspected for weapons, is actually an escalation in preparation for a possible military intervention. Even without any recognizable support from the West and Syria's neighboring counties, the rebels have proved to be resilient and capable of withstanding the regime's brutality. These slight fractures within the Alawite regime will certainly become larger and cause the Assad regime to implode due to the tremendous and consistent pressure by the rebels and the FSA.

http://www.france24.com/en/20121003-shoot-out-syria-corleone-exposes-new-threat-bashar-mohammed-al-assad-alawite
http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArticleDetails.aspx?ID=444697
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/world/middleeast/syria.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/syria-shabbiha-extortion-idUSL5E8KP4AZ20120925
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-05/190283-alawite-group-calls-on-sect-to-join-syria-revolt.ashx
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/10/11/243174.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443294904578048533028390640.html

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran