Skip to main content

View on the News-29/07/10

American and Egyptian scholars strive to bridge religion gap

Fifteen young American religious scholars and 14 teaching assistants from Al Azhar University - one of the oldest and most influential Islamic institutions in the world - spent two weeks together this month at Georgetown University in an attempt to bridge the divide between the Muslim world and the United States. The potpourri of young religious scholars studied the legal foundations of American democracy and religious diversity in the U.S. and met with political figures, including White House advisor Valerie Jarrett and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim American elected to Congress. The American and Egyptian students spent eight to nine hours in class each day and lived together in Georgetown dorms. The Americans included members of the Jewish, Buddhist and Christian faiths. Though Al Azhar has a long history of global engagement, the university, under the direction of a new leader, the French-educated Ahmed Tayeb, feels the need to adapt its tactics in light of changing times, said Mahmoud Azab, an Al Azhar professor of Semitic languages and civilizations. Gihan Ibrahim Shaaban, an Al Azhar professor of linguistics, said the university felt compelled to act by some Americans' perception that Islam calls for terrorism. "We have to show the real Islam," she said.Patrice Brodeur, an associate professor of Islam at the University of Montreal, who led sessions at the conference, said Al Azhar's international engagement may surprise some given the university's history of traditional Islamic scholarship. Jocelyne Cesari, director of the Islam in the West Program at Harvard and Johns Hopkins universities, said in a telephone interview that she is encouraged that Al Azhar is reaching out, but she said that it is important for the United States to respond in kind.

FBI policies against Muslims attacked

US civil liberties groups have attacked FBI domestic surveillance guidelines, claiming that they unfairly target innocent Muslims in terrorism and other criminal investigations. "It's quite an invasive data collection system," said Farhana Khera, executive director of the Muslim Advocates group. "It's based on generalised suspicion and fear on the part of law enforcement, not on individualised evidence of criminal activity." The FBI claimed that its procedures were designed to ensure that probes don't zero in on anyone on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or the exercise of any other constitutional right. Its Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide was approved in December 2008 during the final days of the George W Bush administration and establishes policy that guides all FBI domestic operations, including counterterrorism, counterintelligence, crime and cyber crime. But the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is also concerned about the procedures. It has asked FBI field offices in 29 states and Washington, DC, to turn over records related to the bureau's collection of data on race and ethnicity. The FBI operations guide gives agents the authority to create maps of ethnic-oriented businesses, behaviour, lifestyle characteristics and cultural traditions in communities with concentrated ethnic populations.

British Army 'nearly seized up' fighting on two fronts

The Army came close to 'seizing up' under the intense pressure of fighting wars simultaneously in Iraq and Afghanistan, a defence chief said yesterday. Two former military leaders appeared at the Iraq Inquiry to lay bare a catalogue of failures which left troops overstretched and overburdened. And the pair criticised the Labour government for poor political leadership and problems with vital equipment and training which jeopardised lives and damaged morale. General Sir Richard Dannatt, the chief of the general staff from 2006 to 2009, even hinted he believed Britain was wrong to attack Iraq - a war the Army had 'no desire' to fight and which undermined the 'more important' campaign in Afghanistan. Meanwhile General Sir Mike Jackson - his predecessor as the UK's top soldier from 2003 to 2006 - said troops suffered because of a shortage of helicopters in Iraq while morale received a blow through shortages of personal kit. Their claims will add fuel to accusations that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown repeatedly treated the military with contempt while in power.

David Cameron refuses to back down over terror remarks about Pakistan

No 10 said that the Prime Minister had no intention of rowing back from his warning to Pakistan that the country must not "promote the export of terror" around the world. Islamabad warned that his words had made the region more unstable. During a series of interviews in India, where he is on a three-day trade mission and where his words have been welcome, he insisted that he had a duty to say what he thought. "I don't think the British taxpayer wants me to go around the world saying what people want to hear," he said. Asked if his remarks had "overshadowed" his visit, he added: "I don't think it's overshadowed anything. "I think it's important to speak frankly and clearly about these issues. I have always done that in the past and will do so in the future."

Indian teacher barred from work for refusing burqa

A female lecturer has been prevented from teaching at a Muslim university in eastern India by students demanding that she wear a full veil, a report said Thursday. Aliah University in Kolkata is the first Muslim university in West Bengal state and has no formal dress code, but its student union has demanded that female teachers cover themselves in class. Sirin Middya told the Indian Express she had refused to comply and had been prevented from teaching for three months. "Most of the teachers do not like the diktat of the students to wear the burqa, but they have no option but to accept it," she told the newspaper. "This is the Talibanisation of educational premises and there is no one to come to our rescue."

July 29 2010

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran